Here is a laughable attempt by the 5 eyes alliance and their ridiculous attempts at pro pagan da, to distort the truth for the masses and form their opinions.
For years the headlines have covered the controversies over advanced Russian air defense systems heading to Iran.
But now the arms traffic is very much in the other direction, writes Jonathan Marcus of the Strategy and Security Institute, University of Exeter.
Iranian-supplied drones are being used by Moscow to terrorize Ukrainian civilians and to strike at the country’s electricity generating and distribution system.
The truth; US style HIMAR’s are destroying Ukrainian civilians and their infrastructure, aided and abetted by the Jewish led Nazi, Zelensky.
Russia’s predicament in Ukraine has prompted Moscow to turn to Tehran for stocks of precision-guided weapons.
Its own arsenals are fast running out.
The truth; no, they are not they are sharing resources.
There have been a number of instances where coastal defense and air defense missiles have been used by the Russians to strike at land targets in Ukraine, a role for which they are not best suited.
So on the one hand they are destroying everything, but in the next line they are not suitable? Confused much?
Transport flights have been monitored heading from Iran to Russia.
Reports from US sources suggest that Iranian trainers from the IRGC, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, have deployed to a base in Crimea to teach Russian personnel how to operate the systems.
Wreckage from drones that have been shot down, both Iranian Shahed-131 loitering munitions known as kamikaze drones and the larger Shahed-136 has been analyzed.
There is no doubt that Tehran, despite its denials, is compensating for a significant shortfall in Russia’s arsenal.
What a pathetic report that is, all to denigrate Russia and Iran again.
Ignoring the weapons the US, UK and others have sent that has escalated the war.
Surely if they were observing deliveries of such weapons, they would have intercepted them? Like they do with oil tankers.
Or people who could bring revolutionary change to the world, they shoot them out of the sky or disappear it, like the Malaysia plane, or sink the Olympic, not the Titanic and stop those voting against the Federal Reserve harvesting system.
The hypocrisy is staggering, given they and their war machines have supplied everyone with weapons of destruction against the people.
Remember they are cowardly and don’t fight the wars, the war pigs, they leave that all too the poor remember.
Here is another pro pagan da news item, all designed to promote fear again.
The Chinese government has been accused of establishing at least two undeclared police stations in the Netherlands.
Dutch media found evidence that the overseas service stations, which promise to provide diplomatic services, are being used to try to silence Chinese dissidents in Europe.
A spokeswoman for the Dutch foreign ministry said the existence of the unofficial police outposts was illegal.
The Chinese foreign ministry has rejected the Dutch allegations.
The investigation was sparked by a report entitled Chinese Transnational Policing Gone Wild, by the Spain-based NGO Safeguard Defenders.
According to the organization, the public security bureaus from two Chinese provinces had established 54 overseas police service centers across five continents and 21 countries.
Most of them are in Europe, including nine in Spain and four in Italy.
In the UK, it found two in London and one in Glasgow.
The units were ostensibly created to tackle transnational crime and conduct administrative duties, such as the renewal of Chinese drivers’ licenses.
But, according to Safeguard Defenders, in reality they carry out persuasion operations, aimed at coercing those suspected of speaking out against the Chinese regime to return home.
The pressure is now on the Dutch government to ensure critics of the Chinese government who are granted asylum can be protected, and that in the Netherlands, Dutch law prevails.
What they are protecting is, defecting spies.
All part of the massive amount of wasting funds on the world of espionage.
Which is all based on fear and child level operations.
Here are some common sense questions; why did the predominantly NATO led countries allow these “police stations” to exist on their soil to begin with?
Perhaps the people should focus on the cause not the effect?
The irony of it all is, these same countries support the US, who have over 900 police stations in other countries, better known as Military bases.
Why are Chinese police stations any different to the US Military outposts?
Here is a novel idea, keep your police stations and military bases in your own countries, problem solved.
Hypocrisy again like the previous story and also the Nuclear weapons narrative, where some jackasses decides which country can have them and which country can’t, it is all very child level thinking.
It’s my ball and you can’t play with it, utterly pathetic behavior and thinking processes.

The UK stazi issued a warning last week, I guess they need more funds off of the public again.
A warning in the UK has been issued to drivers about wearing winter clothing whilst driving.
Wearing common items like coats, gloves and scarves while driving could land them with a £5,000 fine.
Any piece of clothing that impairs your vision or prevents you from using the car’s controls, could lead to a £5,000 fine and potentially three points on your license.
So, now they have not just a mobile phone police over there, but a hat, coat and gloves police.
It is expensive enough over there owning and running a car due to excessive taxes and rules, without adding more stazi tactics to it.
Perhaps the people should ask the police whether their attire is an issue behind the wheel?
Not to mention most of them are overweight and are too far from the wheel, is that not a hazard?

As a report comes out detailing there is 1m km more sea ice at the Arctic than 10 years ago, and another report comes out discounting yachts from carbon taxes.
Yachts are only owned by the wealthy you see, and they think taxes are only to be paid by the unwealthy.
Which is why they won’t implement a basic tax structure, based on the more you earn and pay, the more taxes you spend.
Climate change is another tax, just like inflation, that does not affect the wealthy, only the poorer elements of society.
It is high time the people got together and changed those policies, that is what the Blueprint is all about.
Bring life and lifestyles into balance.

Here is a positive story, the protestors are getting under their skin it seems.
As Pennsylvania state Rep. Ryan Bizzaro, D., appeared to lambast some parent school board protesters as malcontents in a recent interview on the Joel Natalie Show, sparking a contentious response on social media.
Like I have said all along, all we have to do is keep pushing and they will buckle.
Finally after ten years we have them now defending against us, instead of attacking.
Their collapse now depends on us all to keep knocking on their doors, keep making them accountable and they will run.

Evidence of the collective consciousness unfolding again, with these choice of words from the Pope of all people.
With Russia’s war in Ukraine raging, Pope Francis joined Muslim, Christian and Jewish leaders Friday in calling for the world’s great religions work together for peace, telling an interfaith summit that religion must never be used to justify violence and that faith leaders must counter the “childlike” whims of the powerful to make war.
Indeed, and nice that someone else notices that and vocalizes it.

This is getting interesting now, the faction level outing of groups we have targeted heavily within our shows, and also the agenda behind it.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a group funded by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, delivered hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to a George Soros-backed nonprofit group that may have illegally failed to disclose its lobbying activities.
Alianza Americas, a 501(c)(3) pro-immigration nonprofit group, received $440,000 combined in 2019 and 2020 from CZI, including, in one case, money related to an issue Alianza appears to have lobbied Congress about during that same time period, according to CZI’s grant database and tax records reviewed by the Washington Examiner.
The revelation comes after the National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative watchdog group, alleged in an Oct. 26 complaint to the IRS.
That the agency should investigate whether Alianza violated federal law when it claimed in its 2019 and 2020 tax returns that it didn’t lobby, despite Alianza disclosing extensive lobbying activities in these same documents.
Alianza came into the public eye when it filed a lawsuit in September against Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis over him flying illegal immigrants to Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts.
Between 2016 and 2020, the charity raked in about $1.4 million from Soros’s Open Society Foundations network, records show.
The Israeli lobbying group at it again, notice it surrounds flooding the country with immigrants?
This is about diluting the white race again, more on that later.
In light of our recent expose on Yale and Harvard, Chan and Zuckerberg both met in Harvard.
Follow-ups on two stories we ran recently.
New details have emerged from the Paul Pelosi case, the attacker was known to Paul Pelosi as he gave his name to the police.
The police arrived and Paul Pelosi and the attacker were in just their underwear.
Window that was broken was broken from the inside not the outside.
Attack only took place after the police arrived.
It appears the attacker called David Depape, David the father? It appears as though Depape was a male prostitute and this was something along the lines of a lovers tiff.
Not a Trump led assault team like the media are trying to spin it as.
The guy Depape looks mysteriously like a cameraman who was filming the January 6th riot last year.
Again all the world is a stage it seems.
Will Depape be Epstein’d?
The irony is, if Paul Pelosi was an ordinary person he would still be in jail for DUI, and this event would never have unfolded, whether staged or not.

The former chief operating officer of Yeezy, who is Jewish, has defended Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, following his antisemitic remarks, telling people to chill and to not judge him.
Udi Avshalom, who worked for the Yeezy brand from 2017 until this month, reportedly wrote on Instagram that while he loves his former boss, he is also upset at the same time.
He claimed Ye knows he’s talking nonsense but called for people to not judge him, as he would come to realize his error.
Ye made antisemitic remarks on Twitter earlier this month.
He said he would be going death con 3 on Jewish people, but that he couldn’t be antisemitic because black people are actually Jew also.
Ye said he lost $2 billion in a day after his offensive comments and related behavior.
All of which shows the power of the media influencers.
Notice the media never looks into or researches any of the material, before they decide to demean people?
All of which reveals it is a program.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be on her way out of the Democratic Party’s leadership role, according to a Friday report.
Politico reported that the battle to succeed her actually began Sept. 1 during a “secret” meeting between Reps. Hakeem Jeffries of New York and House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn of South Carolina.
Jeffries, the fifth-ranking House Democrat who aspires to be the first-ranking House Democrat in the next Congress, was picking up heightened chatter from colleagues about California Rep. Adam Schiff’s outreach expressing his own interest in the top caucus job, the report noted.
No surprise the shifty weasel wants top job.
In September, amid rumors that Pelosi would retire if the Democrats lose control of the House, or she will be pushed out it seems.
All depends on how the (s)elections go.
By the time I have read this out we will likely know, unless the votes go on for weeks and months again.

According to the latest polls at RealClearPolitics, Abrams trails incumbent Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) by anywhere from 6 points into double digits.
Abrams began by saying that she did not believe the polls, which have so far suggested her support among black male voters has dropped off since her last attempt at the Georgia governor’s mansion, meant that there was any real enthusiasm for Kemp.
I do not believe it’s because of a deep well of enthusiasm for my opponent, Abrams said, pivoting immediately to make the argument about race and suggesting that black men, specifically, had been targeted and fallen victim to misinformation, although she did not clarify what exactly they were being misinformed about. (M)
Common theme that it seems, make allegations or claims in private yet won’t reveal the details in public, all of which means behind it, hides the lies.
We know that black voters are often discounted, and unfortunately, this year, black men have been a very targeted population for misinformation.
“We know that black voters are often discounted” or is it miscounted, given she is from Georgia.
Not the cleverest thing to say, but nobody believes politicians are that clever anyway, apart from a small few.
Not misinformation about what they want, but about why they want what they deserve, she said.
I am sure yes got the intention by that sentence, but not sure anyone else would.
My campaign has been the only one that has very intentionally, thoughtfully and consistently reached out.
News Nation’s Zaid Jilani noted that if current poll trends turn out to be accurate, Abrams will have slipped from earning 94% of the black vote in 2018 to garnering 82% of the black vote just four years later.
Jilani went on to suggest that, rather than misinformation, perhaps it was Kemp’s focus on jobs that accounted for the swing in support.
I think there’s a pretty simple reason Kemp might be doing better with black men than he did in 2018, Jilani tweeted.
A few days ago he was at the groundbreaking of a Hyundai electric vehicle plant outside Savannah, the largest economic development in GA history. It’s jobs.
Kemp announced the project which will create over 8,000 new jobs and see Hyundai investing more than $5.5 billion in Georgia’s economy last May.
This is the same woman who imposed masks on the children in schools, and yet turned up to schools wearing no mask herself.
Not to mention the election skullduggery that took place in Georgia last time out.
Update from that is, she lost again, be fun if she asked for recount and claimed election fraud would it not?

Two days after the selection and we still have no result, as yet again the same states from the last selection, Arizona, Georgia and Nevada take center stage again in the theater of the absurd and illusion game.
Georgia is facing a run off, I wish they would all run off into oblivion permanently.

Canada playing stazi tactics again it seems.
The government of Ontario has passed a controversial law that could impose a fine of C$4,000 ($2,900; £2,600) a day for workers who go on strike.
To pass the bill, the government invoked a special clause that allows it to bypass constitutional challenges.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees responded with defiance, saying workers would strike, regardless.
The legislation would also allow for a C$500,000 a day fine against the union itself.
CUPE represents some 55,000 education workers, including educational assistants, custodians and administrative staff.
The union originally asked for an 11.7% annual pay rise for its employees across the board, but sources told local media the ask had been dropped to roughly 6% during last-minute negotiations.
The government countered with an offer of 2.5% for workers making less than C$43,000, and 1.5% for those earning more, and yet the average inflation rate is 7%.
Which means the gap between wages and inflation is another tax on the people.
Union leaders have called for province-wide political protest starting on Friday after the government introduced Bill 28, which enforces the daily fines for a four-year period.
They have promised to pay the fines of those on strike.
Our members will not have their rights legislated away, said Fred Hahn, President of CUPE Ontario.
Now’s the time to stand up for ourselves and public education and that’s just what we’re going to do.
Can’t speak out, can’t protest and now can’t strike, what type of Zionist Fascist regime is Canada actually running?
The simple solution is, no one votes, then none of them get in positions of power, to be passing draconian legislation.

These next two pieces will reflect the sudden change of thinking amongst the establishments and their armies of Milgram Experimentation peoples, who follow their narrative without any due diligence.
This is not from a tabloid paper, this is one of the broadsheets, the Telegraph in the UK.
When Britain first locked down on March 23 2020, the average daily death rate from Covid was around 213, triggering understandable alarm and the ushering in of strict restrictions.
Now, a similar number of unexpected deaths are occurring each day, the majority of which are not primarily caused by the coronavirus.
Yet there is largely silence from the Government and health service, the paper claimed.
There was largely silence from the newspapers when it started, silence and then silencing those of us who warned you it was a disaster unfolding.
That is not hindsight, that was insight, and the MSM establishments all ignored it, and indeed went further into name calling and demeaning those with some intelligence, something they clearly lacked.
Data from the Office for National Statistics shows that in the past six months there have been more excess deaths from causes other than Covid, than deaths due to coronavirus for the entire year.
Figures reveal there were 18,394 deaths due to Covid recorded this year in England and Wales.
But since May there have been 23,195 excess deaths where the primary cause was another condition.
Some of those people did die with a coronavirus infection, but it was not the main reason for the death.
Experts continue to argue over the reasons behind this recent uptick in unexpected deaths, which shows no sign of slowing.
I would think it would be at this stage a captain obvious reason, but these people are going through the 3 stages of truth still and still want to make excuses for being wrong.
Being wrong is one thing, we all get many things wrong, but our wrongs by and large don’t destroy economies, lifestyles, countries, make people homeless, harm others temporarily maybe but permanently never.
Neither does our being wrong kill masses of people either.
But it is likely that collateral damage from the pandemic, coupled with long term NHS problems, have collided into a perfect and deadly storm.
In 2020, there were 31,064 fewer hospital admissions for heart patients, 14,506 fewer emergency admissions and 16,560 fewer elective procedures compared to 2016-2019 in England, Scotland and Wales.
Elective admissions were still down in 2021, with 10,996 fewer operations but, alarmingly, emergency admissions for heart problems had increased by 25,878.
Here comes some fairly desperate excuses to avoid saying the full truth.
We focused on the direct effects of excess deaths from Covid but from the beginning it’s likely the indirect effects will lead to more deaths, and more morbidity and more economic impacts than Covid deaths itself.
Some experts have argued that the figures may not be quite as worrying, because the ONS does not take into account population changes, simply comparing weekly figures to the expected five-year average excluding 2020.
As the population ages, more people would be expected to die each year.
However, other measures which do take the ageing population into account are also showing worrying rises in excess deaths.
No shit sherlock, like all of those in care homes, let’s start with that shall we?
We covered the excess deaths of the elderly in care homes in back on May 28th 2020, where were these people then?
Oh I forgot, they ignored it.
A recent report from the Institute of Actuaries Continuous Mortality Investigation showed that in the third quarter – July, August and September, Britain saw the highest mortality since 2010.
Cobus Daneel, the chair of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee, said: The third quarter of 2022 saw unusually high mortality for the time of year, higher than any third quarter since 2010.
There were more deaths than expected from non-Covid causes.
This contrasts with most of the pandemic period, when non-Covid deaths were lower than expected.
Hello McFly!! Because every death was recorded as Covid is why, all to fulfill an agenda, and now they wish to play statistics games?
The time to correct statistics was before the lockdowns took place, when Johns Hopkins did their now legendary faulty math, and convinced the clowns and public that the pandemic would be worse by ten-fold.
The situation is all the more unusual as mortality rates should have fallen after the pandemic because so many people died early, an effect known as harvesting.
Instead we are seeing the reverse trend.
An effect known as harvesting? Oh my what a statement that is, if that is harvesting who was the farmer with an F? or was it pharma with a Ph?
The Government has made a half-hearted attempt to find out what is going on with excess deaths, asking for a report from the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities.
A bit like this report then, half-hearted.
The report showed a worrying increase in deaths in people who had heart complaints and diabetes, many of which were preventable.
Recent reports have found that people hospitalized with Covid-19 are more likely to suffer heart problems, particularly in the first month after their release, which could be leading to some of the excess.
Hello McFly again, that tells you it is because of the jabs then does it not?
Epidemiologist Veena Raleigh, a senior fellow at The King’s Fund, who recently investigated the probable causes for the excess believes this could be a real factor, along with NHS problems.
She told The Telegraph: The continuing trend of higher numbers of deaths in England and Wales than expected compared with previous years, apparent since the spring, is worrying.
From April to mid-October there have been almost 30,000 excess deaths, of which one-third have been due to Covid-19 a reminder that the virus remains a life-threatening risk.
Nope it is the vaccines that are the life threatening risk.
This is a cautionary piece and gently introducing to the public, the possibility they and all the establishment were wrong.
The pathetic excuses to avoid the obvious conclusion is not befitting of any adult.
Time these people man up and tell the public the full truth, not veiled attempts at it.
Then we can address the problem of how to fix it.

The great pull back predicted by our show on Covid is now reaching the comedic levels, as well as the utter panic levels we also forecasted.
In January of this year, I predicted the Covid scam would end this year, it has, but now comes the fall out.
The fall out this time is not of the nuclear variety, although the backlash will be.
Just last week I warned they would introduce another virus or strain to cover up the winter of discontent we are about to enter.
That winter of discontent will not just be financial, as major proponents of the financial system raised more direct taxes on the people again last week, called interest rates.
But for the people those rates don’t interest us, they crash and burn us.
And again only the wealthy gain and thrive.
The winter of discontent will be an increase in die offs, just as we and certain doctors warned in the Expose series.
But here comes the panic now.
The Atlantic has come under fire for suggesting that all the terrible pandemic-era decisions over lockdowns, school closures, masking.
Punishing an entire class of people who questioned the efficacy and wisdom of taking a rushed, experimental vaccine, for a virus with a 99% survival rate in most, should all be water under the bridge.
We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about Covid, writes Brown Professor Emily Oster, who was a huge lockdown proponent, who now pleads from mercy from the once-shunned.
Yes, it is not writes but pleads, these people will all turn into pariahs in the coming months and years.
Let’s acknowledge that we made complicated choices in the face of deep uncertainty, and then try to work together to build back and move forward, she continues.
Except, they weren’t in the dark about Covid were they?
If they were, that right there is proof of a dereliction of duty to the patients.
It means they are not experts within their own fields, and people trust these people?
Well more fool you.
Why do people consider anyone or anything an expert without due process?
That is a dereliction of duty to the self, is it not?
Millions if not billions have done a dereliction of duty to the self major harm within these past two years.
That is not the fault of the Government, medical people or the experts, that is your own fault for not doing due diligence.
Many will not like that statement, as too many lack personal responsibility, which is the central figure of these matters.
There were numerous sources pointing out the actual science that ran contrary to the mandate claims, and they were deliberately silenced by a vast media campaign.
Evidence revealed that media platforms worked in tandem with Big Tech, the CDC and the Biden Administration.
It was not a simple matter of overreaction, there was collusion to remove all counter-information.
As the Daily Sceptic’s Michael P. Senger puts it: There’s a lot wrong here.
First, no, you don’t get to advocate policies that do extraordinary harm to others, against their wishes, then say, we didn’t know any better at the time!
Ignorance doesn’t work as an excuse when the policies involved abrogating your fellow citizens’ rights under an indefinite state of emergency, all while censoring and cancelling those who weren’t as ignorant.
The inevitable result would be a society in which ignorance and obedience to the opinion of the mob would be the only safe position.
There will be a number of these types of pieces in the coming 12 months, but saying we told you so will not provide harmony, only increase division.
Just like the Piers Morgan piece recently.
All about saving their own skin, the question is; which skin do they have? Is it natural or synthetic?
More importantly is, what is under the skin?
The blueprint has a full solution to this, that not only fixes the issues, but provides balanced solutions for us all to heal.
Maybe the quarantine this winter of all the vaxxed, would be the best solution to begin that.

Pfizer and BioNTech have launched a clinical trial on a vaccine targeting both COVID-19 and influenza, the companies announced Thursday.
Take note of that as it will figure prominently in an upcoming show on possibly Tuesday next week.

We have covered these harvesters before in THI shows, including an in depth expose previously.
It seems that others have cottoned onto the ongoing criminal acts involving Blackrock, who are representatives of the Black Sun cult.
A close reading of a letter from nineteen US states that takes investment giant BlackRock to task for putting its Environmental, Social and Governance goals, ahead of the best possible investment returns for American citizens.
It reveals that BlackRock, which, along with Vanguard and State Street, is one of the big three in the index fund management field, is literally setting policy and governing the world in key ways.
This position is clearly spelled out in the letter by the Attorneys-General of the following states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
They write in the interests of the state employees whose pensions are invested by BlackRock.
This matter was first reported on the 5 August 2022 broadcast of UK Column News by Alex Thomson of Eastern Approaches, in the segment beginning at 16:14.
Which is interesting, as THI did the full expose of Blackrock and Vanguard on June 30th, 6 weeks before that podcast.
The present article provides more details on the reality of private governance, craftily portrayed as seeking dialogue by BlackRock in this particular case and on how it circumvents, or even usurps, governmental action by elected legislators.
Funds as bullies:
The AGs’ detailed eight-page letter was collectively sent to BlackRock Inc.’s CEO Laurence Larry D. Fink on 4 August.
It represents a significant revelation of BlackRock’s meddlesomeness.
Signed by the chief law officers of 38% of the states in the Union, the letter does not mince words.
Its second paragraph states:
Based on the facts currently available to us, BlackRock appears to use the hard-earned money of our states’ citizens to circumvent the best possible return on investment, as well as their vote.
BlackRock’s past public commitments indicate that it has used citizens’ assets to pressure companies to comply with international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement that force the phase-out of fossil fuels, increase energy prices, drive inflation and weaken the national security of the United States.
These agreements have never been ratified by the United States Senate.
The Senators elected by the citizens of this country determine which international agreements have the force of law, not BlackRock.
Congress has been a waste of space for around 100 years, all about what the bankers and think tanks want, rather than the country or its people.
We have several additional concerns that fall under our jurisdictional authority as attorneys general.
The AGs’ letter also notes that Mark McCombe, BlackRock’s chief client officer, recently wrote to several US states to describe BlackRock’s position on energy investments with respect to state pension funds.
Mr. McCombe’s letter contains many statements that appear to conflict with BlackRock’s previous public statements and commitments.
Moreover, while McCombe’s letter had claimed that BlackRock is neutral on energy questions, and simply offers clients a range of energy-sector investment options, these AGs aren’t buying it.
Saying that this claim of neutrality, differs considerably from BlackRock’s public commitments which indicate that BlackRock has already committed to accelerate net zero emissions across all of its assets, regardless of client wishes.
BlackRock joined the Net Zero Managers Alliance, which, among other things, directs members to acknowledge that, there is an urgent need to accelerate the transition towards global net zero emissions and for asset managers to play our part to help deliver the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Note the key phrases accelerate the transition and to help deliver the goals of the Paris Agreement—a pact which, according to the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, entered into force on November 4, 2016.
Other countries have continued to become parties to the Paris Agreement as they complete their domestic approval procedures.
As of January 2021, 190 parties have ratified the Paris Agreement, on January 20, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order to rejoin the Paris Agreement.
That was done in the wake of then-President Trump’s 1 June 2017 announcement of his administration’s intention to withdraw the United States from the agreement.
While Biden may entertain delusions to the contrary, no president can actually ratify a treaty with an executive order.
That is the sole domain of the Senate.
Mayors operating as diplomats:
The CCES is agitating to call the shots, with the formation of global cities whose mayors increasingly see themselves as national and international officiators, well beyond their lawful and traditional local municipal functions.
Like BlackRock, but with less brazenness, the mayors of subnational administrations are prone to sidestep the nation state.
The CCES, although it does understate the designs of dozens of major self-proclaimed global cities around the world to operate on internationalist principles and support global accords, even when these are at odds with domestic customs and state or national laws.
In response to Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, other governments strongly reaffirmed their commitment to the agreement.
U.S. cities, states, and other non-state actors also reiterated their support for the agreement and pledged to continue to enhance their climate efforts.
The United States formally initiated its withdrawal from the agreement on November 4, 2019; the withdrawal took effect on November 4, 2020.
Bookkeepers operating as gamblers:
The letter from the AGs to BlackRock also makes the wry observation that, in the investment field, rather than being a spectator betting on the game, BlackRock appears to have put on a quarterback jersey and actively taken the field.
The letter adds:
As a firm, BlackRock has committed to implementing an ESG engagement and voting strategy across all assets under management, and held over 2,300 company engagements on climate, the most of any category of engagement.
BlackRock took voting action against 53 companies on climate issues, with 191 companies put on watch.
A governance engagement strategy, primarily focused on BlackRock’s climate agenda, necessarily overlays ESG factors on the core index portfolios, that comprise a substantial part of many state pension funds.
ESG stands for Environmental, social, and governance fund.
In other words, a significant cash flow for the bankers and EL-ites.
Yet again attempting to rob countries blind.
You have to consider, they have never done a single thing in those three categories to date, so why now? So, they can collect more funds from the public.
They are not interested in the Environment, social change or true governance, of for and by the people.
BlackRock’s engagement strategy, in which a net zero climate agenda is a significant or main consideration, would covertly convert states’ core index portfolios to ESG-focused funds should the SEC’s recently proposed definition of an ESG fund be adopted.
And what is the proposed ESG fund definition maintained by the SEC, the US market regulator referred to above?
Although the AGs’ letter does not state it, the SEC, via the federal government’s rule-making process whereby proposed agency rules are published in the US Federal Register—at which point, any proposed rule is open to public comment for a specified time period—has already described it as follows, in typical bureaucratic parlance, in a May 2022 online bulletin:
The Securities and Exchange Commission; is proposing to amend rules and forms under both the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require registered investment advisers, certain advisers that are exempt from registration, registered investment companies and business development companies, to provide additional information regarding their environmental, social and governance investment practices.
The proposed amendments to these forms and associated rules seek to facilitate enhanced disclosure of ESG issues to clients and shareholders.
The proposed rules and form amendments are designed to create a consistent, comparable, and decision-useful regulatory framework for ESG advisory services and investment companies to inform and protect investors, while facilitating further innovation in this evolving area of the asset management industry.
In other words, the US Government wants better disclosure to investors about ESG investments, but does not appear to take much issue with the ESG goals themselves, though one wouldn’t necessarily expect the federal government to take a stance either way on ESG.
Yet this measure evidently raises the bar a little higher in terms of the legal-disclosure hurdles which BlackRock must clear, as it seeks to funnel gargantuan sums of money into its pet ESG goals.
Despite this, the door is left open for further innovation.
Vulture capitalists again, their own pet projects, with their stooges in place to gain, it is just another harvesting session.
One has to ask is; where do they think the funding is coming from?
Activists as authorities:
It is also highly noteworthy that the AGs’ letter raises the matter of BlackRock having joined climate change advocacy organizations.
BlackRock had said it had joined them to participate in dialogue with governments, companies and financial institutions on sustainability issues important to our clients.
There is that agenda 2030 word again, sustainability.
The irony is, their fiscal policies are not sustainable either, at which point will they realize that?
In response, the AGs write:
Under our state laws, the desired dialogue regarding any potential energy transition would be how to maximize financial returns, which would potentially include the opportunistic purchasing of fossil fuel assets discarded by companies seeking to meet net zero commitments.
What like the selling of 23K oil wells in California we reported last week? To a German firm.
However, any discussion of purchasing such assets to maximize returns is conspicuously absent from GFANZ or Climate Action 100+.
The AGs, citing the BlackRock-GFANZ connection, point out that BlackRock is engaging in activism rather than dialogue, as evidenced by the following GFANZ Steering Committee statement of which the AGs reminded Mr. Fink:
The systemic change needed to alter the planet’s climate trajectory can only happen if the entire financial system makes ambitious commitments and operationalizes those commitments with near-term action.
That is why we formed GFANZ, to bring together over 450 leading financial enterprises united by a commitment to accelerate the decarbonization of the global economy.
The great question is; who or what is the carbon they are removing?
Notably, GFANZ is the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero.
I thought it stood for Global Fockers And National Zionism, seems to fit more aptly.
It was launched in April 2021 by UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance and former governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada Mark Carney.
We exposed Carney a few years back, he went from the Governor of the Bank of Canada to the same position in the Bank of England, a former student of Harvard.
Which follows the pattern of Yale and Harvard people only getting the top positions we reported last week.
Carney is a member of the Group of Thirty, an international body of leading financiers and academics, and of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum.
The COP26 summit, or Conference of the Parties, or perhaps it stands for Clowns On Parade, was hosted by the UK in Glasgow in the autumn of 2021.
COP26, in partnership with the UN-backed Race to Zero campaign launched by UN High-Level Climate champions Nigel Topping and Gonzalo Muñoz, seeks to unite net-zero financial sector-specific alliances from across the globe into one industry-wide strategic alliance, according to the GFANZ website.
There is your one world governance strategy.
That is clearly a mechanism for a one-size-fits-all juggernaut to thwart governmental regulations of any substance, and then privately to govern the financial system on the basis of a flimsy climate ideology posing as science.
Ah the science, remember the meme trust the science, this is what it scientifically meant.
BlackRock, as the AGs rightly worry, is a member of the steering committee of GFANZ and is affiliated with Climate Action 100+, which is an investor-led initiative to attempt to ensure the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change.
If only they would invest in the people? They forget it is the people that generates the money, and yet it doesn’t get spent on them? Well, that is the people’s fault for not demanding accountability and telling the authorities what they wish to see.
The blueprint can change that.
Pattern of machinations:
While the AGs note that BlackRock has chosen to lead detailed, comprehensive efforts to retire fossil fuels and appears to have determined that every company should support the Paris Agreement without exception.
Even though many state pension funds include traditional energy investments that should not be simply disregarded, they also accuse BlackRock of squelching political speech that may impart different opinions on energy sources and related investments.
This, the AGs insist, is the action of an activist company whose mind is made up, not that of a neutral fiduciary seeking dialogue.
To this, the AGs add: Acting with mixed motives triggers an irrebuttable presumption of wrongdoing.
On behalf of the signatories, Nebraska Attorney-General Doug Peterson noted that BlackRock manages over $10 trillion in investment funds.
This includes money from several state retirement plans, in published remarks that comport with the views of the other 18 AGs.
He went on: BlackRock’s fiduciary duty is simple; it is to maximize the return for current and future retirees and the value of other invested state funds.
No it is not, it is to line their own pockets, place the monies in high risk funds, wait until the stock markets crash, which they initiate, and then buy up all the stocks for pennies on the dollar.
The customer loses their pension funds, is exactly how it works.
BlackRock’s duty is not to try to force companies to undermine profits or needlessly expend capital in order to conform with BlackRock’s social and environmental view of the world.
Rather BlackRock’s duty is to invest in well-run businesses and enhance the value, not only in the long term but also the present of the retirement accounts of Nebraska’s teachers, judges, and other state employees.
The Washington D.C.-area journal Politico, back in January 2022, noted:
West Virginia last week said it would pull out of a BlackRock Inc. investment fund, making it the first state to cut ties with a firm over its ESG policy.
West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore, a Republican, said he can’t do business with a company whose investment strategies harm fossil fuel companies.
These folks aren’t policymakers, Moore was quoted as saying.
He continued: What if the shape of society that BlackRock wants is not what we want, what West Virginia wants, what other states want, what probably most Americans want?
People aren’t voting for this at the ballot box.
They’re using their massive amount of corporate power and capital to coercively push their views of the world onto the rest of us.
Exactly and nice to see some politicians speak up.
What Moore apparently doesn’t fully realize, however, is that BlackRock’s brazen financial and social governance is not a mere isolated act of outlawry, but rather is fully consistent with the core plan of private central banks, and their spawn in the corporate world since their inception.
That plan is to sack the nation state and its subdivisions by owning the debt and, from there, eventually commandeering the entire financial infrastructure.
The social and political ramifications are beyond immense.
Whenever nations are saddled with private central banks that issue every currency unit in the form of interest-bearing debt, the stage is set for the dissolution of nation states.
The first order of remedial business would be to undo this state of affairs, lest the financial overlords continue ruling national governments, which, in turn, institute tyranny on behalf of their creditors.
The report was done by a group called UK Column.
What the UK Column people may not know is, that Black Rock is part of the Black Sun cult.
Perhaps the UK Column people need to read to FHSTOS part 8B, then they will really understand what this group is up to.

Here is an interesting report based solely on divide and conquer, where they start off with one topic, lean it towards their agendas, and then merge it into another topic that is agenda driven.
I guess there must be elections coming up, as this is riddled with political grandstanding of blaming one side and not the other.
The problem with the lesser of two evils is, it is still evil.
Watch closely how the narrative slides into a forced opinion based piece.
A growing chorus of voices is warning that our democracy is in grave danger, but there is much less discussion of the exact nature of the threat.
Ignoring the fact that America is not a democracy to begin with, these are subtle often repeated mind control based words, designed to make the public think in a certain way.
Recently, President Biden emphasized the severity of the threat by going to the place where the constitution was signed, to give what the White House described as a speech on the continued battle for the soul of the nation.
What would Biden know about soul? He is an empty vessel, as there is little sign of life, morals or brain cells.
Biden specifically named Donald Trump and the Maga Republicans as the ones carrying out the attacks, and that is accurate, on the surface.
The deeper, more longstanding threat, however, was articulated by historian Taylor Branch in a 2018 conversation with author Isabel Wilkerson recounted in Wilkerson’s book Caste.
As they discussed how the rise of white domestic terrorism under Trump was part of the backlash to the country’s growing racial diversity, Branch noted that, people said they wouldn’t stand for being a minority in their own country.
He went on to add, the real question would be if people were given the choice between democracy and whiteness, how many would choose whiteness?
Whiteness is the deeper threat because championing whiteness is what makes Trump powerful.
Common sense question is; what is wrong with championing whiteness? Is that not what Black Lives Matter is all about,
championing blackness?
Isn’t that what Cinque de Mayo is all about? Championing Hispanics.
Isn’t that what the White House celebration called the Hanukkah is all about? Championing Jewish people?
Let’s look at the national holidays, MLK day quickly followed by Black History month, Hispanic month celebrations and various Jewish celebrations, the only white celebrations are ex- Presidents and they are barely worth celebrating for any colors.
So, I ask the question again; what is wrong with championing whiteness?
People forget that Trump was not particularly well-regarded before he started attacking Mexican immigrants and signaling to white people that he would be the defender of their way of life.
In the months before he launched his campaign, he was polling at just 4% in the May 2015 ABC/Washington Post poll.
After stirring the racial resentment pot, his popularity took off, growing exponentially in a matter of weeks and propelling him to the front of the pack by mid-July 2015 when he commanded support of 24% of voters, far ahead of all the other Republican candidates.
As his support grew with each racially infused statement, such as banning Muslims from entering the US.
Actually, it was also the realm of the MSM, they had spent over a decade of being anti-Muslims, forming the opinions of many Americans.
Yet, Trump says it and it is racist? Where were the jibes of racism pointed at the MSM for their tirade?
The MSM for over a decade told the America people that all Muslims were jihadists, and were responsible for 9/11.
Both were abject lies and where were the everyone is racist and offended by everything people then?
A true journalist provides perspectives and gives both sides and allows the listener or viewer to decide for themselves, not anymore they don’t.
They go into full battle mode of you must believe what we are telling you, the question back is; why?
Why must we believe them? Have they ever been balanced in their reporting? The answer is no.
Trump marveled at the unshakable passion of his followers, observing quite presciently that, I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters, it’s like, incredible.
But that doesn’t only apply to Trump does it? that applies to most fake celebrities, if only we judged them like we judge each other?
Trump’s 2015 discovery of the power of whiteness, is the same lesson that Alabama’s segregationist governor George Wallace internalized in the crucible of southern politics during the civil rights movement in the 1950s.
I started off talking about schools and highways, prisons and taxes, and I couldn’t make them listen, Wallace said, adding, then I began talking about “niggers” and they stomped the floor.
Which back then it seems was deemed acceptable, mainly because the system told them so.
After Trump began talking about Mexicans, and then Muslims, many white people from coast to coast stomped the floor and even stormed the Capitol to keep him in power, seeking to destroy the democratic tradition of a peaceful transfer of power.
Except that was a DNC plan all along, Pelosi and crew was going to destroy the Capital building a year earlier remember.
None of which is anything to do with being white, and all to do with power tripping.
As Wallace’s words show, Trump is not the first leader of a movement to make America white again, and for more than a century we have consistently underestimated the political power of whiteness.
Except only the media decided it was to make America white again, nobody else did a part from a few ignorant people.
The clearest example is the start of the civil war itself.
A hundred and sixty years before the January 6, 2021 insurrection, the legislatures in one-third of the states passed laws rejecting the outcome of a presidential election and then issued a literal call to arms where hundreds of thousands of people picked up their guns and, in the name of defending whiteness, proceeded to shoot and kill hundreds of thousands of their fellow Americans.
Oh my what a his-story revision that is, that had nothing to do with whiteness or slavery, and again to do with power struggles at the top, just like the Tulsa, Oklahoma event in 1922, was blamed on white supremacists, when it was actually the US Military who destroyed that town and many of the black people.
In 1968, Alabama’s Wallace saw that the audience for white nationalism reached far beyond his state’s borders and mounted a presidential campaign that secured 13.5% of all votes cast.
The strength of Wallace’s showing influenced Richard Nixon’s presidential administration to the extent that historian Dan Carter wrote: When George Wallace had played his fiddle, the President of the United States had danced Jim Crow.
In 1990, an actual Klansman, former Grand Wizard of the KKK David Duke, mounted a bid for the US Senate and was initially dismissed as unable to win because of his unapologetic white supremacist views.
Duke shocked the establishment by attracting the support of 44% of Louisiana’s voters.
Remember the KKK was the original military arm of the Democratic party, so why should that be a surprise?
The KKK remember killed many Republican politicians at a Convention in the 1800’s.
Except the media wants you to know only that Trump and all Republicans are racist, it is beyond laughable and bordering on lunacy.
The good news is that the proponents of whiteness do not command majority support.
The original Confederates themselves were in the minority and represented just 11% of the country’s white population.
People who enjoy majority support have no need to unleash fusillades of voter suppression legislation in the states with the largest numbers of people of color.
Yet, from the grandfather clauses of the 1800s to the restrictive voting laws passed last year in the south and south-west, we are seeing an unrelenting practice of trying to depress and destroy democracy, by engaging in what the writer Ron Brownstein has described as, stacking sandbags against a rising tide of demographic change.
Brownstein it will come as to no surprise is born in and born to, how convenient he just happened to be around for their opinion.
Following the Israel Cohen plan to a tee, flood it with other colors and leaves the whites isolated, just like all the European countries.
All whilst the reverse is happening in Israel, this is a demographics war.
Just as the enemies of democracy know that they must destroy democracy in order to prevail, the clearest way to defeat them is to aggressively expand democratic participation.
Democracies are what brought us the SS and the KKK remember, there is no democracy in the strictest sense of the terminology we have been given about the word.
It is this type of Democracy they are running, this taken from our People’s Law show;
The word democracy (from 2 Latin words): “demo” meaning to take away, subtract.
“cratis” meaning ribs, framework/fasces, the bundle of sticks carried by Roman legions signifying Roman Law and rights of Roman citizens.
Hence the original and true meaning of the word democracy is, to take away, subtract Roman Law and Rights through Fascism.
All forms of Government, be it Democracy, Socialism, Communism and even Fascism, are all part of the same system of control, ran by the same group of people known as the Zionist.
They created it all for the illusion of choice and to divide and conquer the people.
Mathematically there is a clear New American Majority made up of the vast majority of people of color in alliance with the meaningful minority of white people who want to live in a multiracial nation.
With the sole exception of the 2004 election, that coalition has won the popular vote in every presidential election since 1992.
In order to defend democracy and win the fight for the soul of the nation, two things must happen.
One is to make massive investments in the people and organizations working to expand voting and civic participation.
Coalitions like America Votes Georgia and Arizona Wins played critical roles in bringing hundreds of thousands of people of color into the electorate, helping to transform those former Confederate bastions.
Which reveals that is direct lobbying against the whites does it not, I wonder which race supports that?
The second step is to directly challenge the nation to choose democracy over whiteness.
When Taylor Branch posed his provocative question in 2018, it was in the wake of tragedies such as the killing of Heather Heyer, a white woman protesting the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia, march of white nationalists incensed at plans to remove Confederate statues.
Trump’s response to Heyer’s killing, she was intentionally struck by a car driven by a white supremacist, was to shrug and note that there were very fine people on both sides of the march.
Very selective choice of killing that, one has to say.
Our detailed past podcast that brought into the light the real details of violence, suggested the main problem was not the whites per se.
All violence regardless of color is not being addressed, and indeed encouraged by think tanks and MSM, that is where the real problems lie.
My basis on life and people is not based on color, like it was when I was much younger, as I explained to one of our black members recently, it is based on, are you a nice upstanding person or not?
That black member was honest, and said too many in the black communities are not nice people.
Now we can carry on ignoring that in favor of black power, but is that power of a violent persuasion or the power of the people acting in a right way under the golden rule?
When he launched his presidential campaign in 2019, Biden explicitly invoked Trump’s post-Charlottesville embrace of whiteness, saying; We have a problem with this rising tide of white supremacy in America, and went on to oust a defender of white nationalism from America’s White House.
Far from being chastened, however, the enemies of democracy have only intensified their efforts.
To ultimately prevail in this defense of our democracy, we must clearly understand the underlying forces imperiling the nation, name the nature of the opposition, and summon the majority of Americans to unapologetically affirm that this is a multi-racial country.
What a spin sentence that was, create the problem, create the fear, demanding a reaction from the public, all to provide their solution they had all along.
Steve Phillips is the founder of Democracy in Color and is a Guardian US columnist.
His book How We Win the Civil War: Securing a Multiracial Democracy and Ending White Supremacy for Good will be published October 18th.
Phillips wrote another book in 2016, his book title? Brown Is the New White.
I am not being funny here, but that is a racist statement, he speaks of one color replacing the other, how is that all about coming together? That he tries to impress in his report, but fails badly.
That is not what brown or black people need to be promoting, it all plays into the hands of the agenda people and programmers.
Phillips has a podcast, maybe our new PA team or the Peoples Colors will engage him, he needs to realize he is being played.
Imagine if people wrote a book detailing securing a world for and by the people and ending Jewish El-ite supremacy?
Would that title be published? No chance, as publishing is ran by the same entities is why.
And yet white people are expected to tolerate these racist, dismissive books, titles and opinions and not say anything back?
Is that right or fair? Are we not going down the same path of the black oppression, just like Candace Owens recently warned of, in relation to the white heterosexual male?
Will that be beneficial for the people? You bet it won’t, it will continue the loop-based cycle of violence plus divide and conquer.
The great question is: if we are going to re-write his story in a whiteness only fashion, why is Columbus Day celebrated?
Why is Thanksgiving celebrated?
Was it not the case that Columbus and the Pilgrims were spreading whiteness? Given that is what unfolded in the subsequent years?
This is not about color, this all about eliminating the one group who are their biggest threat, and have been for a minimum of 110K years.
Why? because the white race is the group least likely to fall for their programs.
The evidence of which is in our own group and many other alt media, the vast majority are white.
All of which makes the other color races unique in and of themselves, as they are the real minority within their own races.
It appears to me at least that, the white people are less controllable than the other races, and given IS ra el and their EL-ites are all about controlling the populaces, this makes the most obvious sense.
The whites are more of the protestors as well, although it is encouraging to see more of the other colors participating together as well.
The whites have a tendency to demand a better standard of living also, which requires the greedy harvesters to supply more money to accommodate it, this is something they do not like.
Sadly, the other color races are more inclined to accept lower standards of housing, living conditions, health, food, water and sanitation, run down towns and cities, less facilities and infrastructure, all of which suits the greed based harvesters more.
This is not just an economic war, it is a genetic war and demographics war, but with a Galactic flavoring bubbling well under the surface.
Is there really a Galactic connection to this as well people may ponder, absolutely as our Cosmic Genetics series revealed.
Volume 1 of our book FHSTOS revealed as much and more in great detail, the Koshey’s became the Koshers.
Again this is not about all Jewish people, the vast majority are oblivious to the fact, they are being used as pawns to play an insidious off-world game.
But the sheer volume of atrocities, control games, wealth stolen, lobbying, political interference, history revision, countries taken over, the porn industry, bank industry, the covid industry has also been administered by and controlled by Jewish EL-ites.
That is an undeniable fact, and if that makes me anti-Semitic, I personally don’t give a shite what they call or label me.
Their labels are; Earth destroyers, parasites and death harvesters, and do more damage per day than the rest of the world combined.

So, why would Phillips a black man go along with what is a Jewish El-ite plan?
Perhaps a look into a connection of Phillips.
Born Marion Osher in Biddeford, Maine on October 17, 1930 to Samuel and Leah Osher, Jewish immigrants from Lithuania and Russia.
In 1963, with $3.8 million in funding from her brother, Bernard, who was a successful businessman, she and her husband created a holding company, Golden West Financial Corporation, and acquired Golden West Savings and Loan Association (renamed the World Savings Bank) in California.
At the time it was a small institution with one branch.
The Sandlers tried new products, and Golden West became the first institution to offer adjustable rate mortgages.
Golden West grew into one of the largest thrifts in the U.S. with assets of approximately $125 billion, deposits of $60 billion and 12,000 employees.
Under the Sandlers’ management, Golden West generated a 19 percent average annual compound growth in earnings per share over a 39-year period.
The company was described as one of the most efficient and productive money machines on the planet.
Marion had a daughter named Susan, Susan is married to Steve Phillips.
The Sandlers also created a non-profit think tank under the banner of investigative journalism, called ProPublica, predictably that is in New York.
ProPublica is run by Paul Steiger, born in and nationality unknown, but Paul is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations.
What a web they weave.

The great question as 2022 nears its end is; just how much truth are people prepared to face?
There are a range of subjects that we cover in our shows that appear to be untouchables for far too many.
The ET narrative being the most prevalent, because that imposes on the bizarre religious belief, that god only created us.
Anything contrary brings in the fear program, and the deeply rooted savior program kicks in to overdrive.
People don’t wish to discuss race in an adult manner, as they become only interested in protecting their own kind at any cost.
The same applies to gender based discussions, too many protect their own kind in that also.
They will discuss it only to the point, it doesn’t reflect onto them, as it affects their own status and over sensitivities.
That then keeps the vast schism we all face of, division and the divide and conquer program firmly ensconced into our psyche, our ways of operating and cabal elements who are dwindling, firmly in control by proxy.
Another lead Rothschild bit the dust this week to add to the dwindling end of the elder psychotic EL-ite.
But, they can all die overnight and nothing will change, unless the people come together, stop triggering themselves with the same programs, all of which means it is unaddressed, and engage in an adult manner.
Over sensitivity is the new culture we have today, as people pick sides based on their own particular labels, and defend them with great vigor and purpose.
Yet what we have all seen within THI shows is, those labels, programs, institutions all didn’t work, yet people still hold onto them for dear life.
Being a critique is almost impossible in this environment, it stifles discourse on a massive scale, as you can never please everyone all of the time.
There is always someone who gets offended, always someone who will protect their own label or kind, always someone who gets triggered, always someone who wants to shoot you down.
Again this plays into stifling the debate and again enables the controllers by proxy to flourish.
Over the 9.25 years of my role as a show host, I have had ran on me no end of abuse, personal critique, flak, derision, betrayals and even hate groups set up all to shut me and the narrative down.
Along with my personal life being combed over, questioned and debated, falsehoods created to put me in bad light.
The great question is; why do the people do that? Why do the people not recognize the very few who are prepared to stand up for them? Why is the truth so hard to accept? Why is there so much targeting of those individuals?
Why would the people themselves do that? What is wrong with people being service to others? What is wrong with people being a light warrior? What is wrong with people championing the peoples cause?
Why is our show more popular in the corridors of power and not the Alt media itself?
THI is not the Alt Media in overview, yes we cover all the Alt Media topics, but we have never really been a part of the Alt Media.
I myself stopped reading or watching it back in 2014, it had served its purpose for me personally, and I charted a different path.
It had to be a different path, as the old ones including the Alt media didn’t work, sadly I was only one of a few who recognized it, Shane and Randy Maugans were the others who could see above the cesspit of the Alt Media and keep a distance.
A few times I have been on other shows, and what unfolded after those appearances? Discord and game playing, some early on, some took a longer route to disconnect from THI and the narrative.
Two things play into that, 1. People are still targeting the speakers and not judging the narrative, 2. People enjoy shooting the messenger.
Again the great question is; who is that really helping? The people or the controllers by proxy?
Alt media goes in memes and themes, first was the ET narrative, then in came the Zeitgeist and all things banking, common law took center stage for a while, money programs via birth certificates, collateral accounts, NESARA, GESARA, then came legal programs of how to not pay taxes, have licenses, claim sovereignty, avoid foreclosure and how to buck the system.
It was interspersed with New Age, Love and Light, veiled Wiccan and other witchcraft exploits, Indian spiritualism, guru retreats and so much more.
In came the Native program of more spiritual retreats, money making programs and ceremonies with magic potions.
In came the stoners wanting pot and other drugs legalized for the own personal gains, be it getting stoned or making money off of it.
In came the race and so called minority programs, Black Lives Matter, Antifa, Gender and Sexuality programs, again spreading division amongst the people, and again the people went along with it.
In came the pointless programs like Flat Earth, Tartaria, mud floods, the moon hoax debate, Magna Carta, CUSIP numbers, Gematria, biblical scriptures and prophecies.
All the above mentioned all plays a role in finding out the truth in some aspects, but not if they become singular items of endless loop based debate, that ultimately divides the people again.
Alt Media in overview is a succession of themes and memes they want you to follow, focus upon, be distracted by and ultimately to not make any dot connections, to overview it all to then provide solutions of not how to debate it, but to fix it.
All those just mentioned were programs installed into the Alt Media by the same unintelligent agents we are supposed to be fighting against and yet we all went along with it.
With no oversight, insight or critique, why? because it made us comfortable to hear those aspects, and largely because A: we didn’t have to do something about it and B: we stood to gain free money and C: it gave us a false sense of belonging.
But did any of those programs lead to anything positive or productive? Did it change the dynamics? Has life improved for us all?
Has life in the past 25 or so years that the Alt Media has been running, got better for us all or worse?
We have had other memes, remember memes are a form of mind control, perpetuate the Alt Media, none moreso than the phenomenon called QAnon.
Suddenly a group buried deep within the realms of the dark web, became mainstream Alt Media and then mainstream media itself.
Riddled with Gematria and biblical prophecy, two memes mentioned earlier and yet people climbed all over it.
Linked with Trump and yet a scratch of the surface it was linked with an Agency program.
Early days I kept quiet, because it least got people to do their own research, and that is a good thing, but once it went to the MSM, that was your cue to realize this is another trap.
Two years on now, and still we wait for more tidbits of mass arrests, executions, NESARA hand-outs and the promised Q drops and White House passes from the Trustee.
QAnon was useful to a point, it got some people to get involved, and you would hope they would become more active, and become activists.
But, activism became a by word for gaining personal status and personal gain, not for the greater overall purpose.
Too few joined the Alt Media with the desire to improve the life for the all, only the self.
Therein lies the deep seated problem, if too many operate only for the self, inevitably the whole thing collapses and resembles the masses world.
But, QAnon backfired for its true purpose, data mine all those involved, put them on watchlists, blacklists and even domestic terrorist lists, as too many got behind it and overwhelmed the system.
So, the QAnon program had to be changed, the focus of attention had to be changed, and what people discuss had to be changed, that in overview is a win for the people.
So what was it that changed the narrative? Covid.
The Covid narrative has effectively replaced the QAnon brigade, now armies of social and alt media endlessly discuss the one topic, which is useful in and of itself, but how many are discussing how to fix it?
Therein lies the greatest failure of the Alt Media and its participants, how many wanted to even discuss fixing it? how many came up with a single solution to fix it? How many are solely fixated on that one topic? How many see the bigger picture beyond the single meme of Covid?
The overview of the Alt Media is; A: it is giant divide and conquer program B: it retains the same popularity based programs the MSM has C: it raised peoples truth barriers from their ankles to their knees D: it showed how people when presented with a program no matter how awake they think they are, will still fall for their programs E: it has become the new religion in many ways, another savior based program F: it is a giant wait club G: allows people to think they are developing more than the masses, but underneath it all, there is only a minor discernable difference.
If that was not the case, then the issues within the masses, would not be repeated with alarming regularity amongst the awakened.
We at THI chartered a different path than the Alt Media for a reason, the Alt Media doesn’t work, things only work of things actually change for the better, it hasn’t and it won’t whilst the people run divide and conquer programs on each other, no matter which format.
Things only really change when you change you, and you then go on to helping others change themselves.
That is called togetherness, the Alt Media is anything but together.
It is a collection of self-centered people seeking fame, fortune and a sense of purpose, with no definitive end goal.
Take mass arrests as an example, 435 Congress people, the President, Vice- President and the Speaker of the House all get arrested at midnight tonight, what happens next?
The majority of Alt Media will celebrate and say look QAnon was right all along, not forgetting that the original David Wilcock was revealing that back in 2002, long before the Drake, others and the QAnon program was introduced.
20 years of waiting for mass arrests? Where did that get us?
So, all the American politicians are stripped and gone, what happens next? We vote for more of the same is what happens next.
Because despite 25 years of the Alt Media and how they were all so different, many Alt Media followers still vote, which is consenting to tyranny in and of itself.
So why does nothing change? Because the people themselves haven’t, despite volumes of information and knowledge, despite endless exposes of the cabal’s actions, despite them breaking up into factions and infighting within the factions, and each faction fighting each other, nothing has changed.
All of which means, we haven’t changed as a collective and now they rule by proxy, within the three programs that damages us all the most.
Seduction and the dangling carrots, divide and conquer and the ultimate tool, fear.
Fear is a low vibration energy drainer, yet why do so many not only carry it, but fiercely protect it?
Those 3 programs are what makes this world bad, disjointed, sinister and evil, and the great question is; what has the Alt Media done to change that?
Something for us all to reflect upon, when critiquing, denigrating, betraying, stifling, questioning and pulling apart the few people who are prepared to stand up for us all.
In essence this piece is more powerful than the ending piece last week, because in overview it tells us all where we are at.
A classic THI piece that hits you squarely between the eyes, it is not popular, may not even be liked, and will likely lead to more critique and questioning.
But the critiquing and questioning for real change, starts within, not external of you.
If only all the Alt Media was questioned, critiqued and dissected like THI and myself is, do you think they would all be left standing?
If only the controllers by proxy where questioned, critiqued and dissected in the same manner THI and myself is, do you think they would all be left standing.
And the final questions are; could you personally tolerate all that level of inquisition? Then why do you think I should?

It seems the final piece last week stirred up many emotions, brought greater clarity within you all.
It was a deep, heavy and loving piece, that should have struck and twanged the hearts of all who listened.
A stirring piece that will play a role in all our futures, a harmonic tone of simplicity that danced through us all.
It brought, joy, happiness, deeper understanding and hopefully a will and pathway for you all to be better tomorrow than you were today.
It is ok to fall occasionally, but how you react to it determines whether that fall escalates or is reversed.
Two steps forward and one step back is still one step forward, and that is progress.
The piece inspired one member to write her story of what that piece brought to her.
These are her words:
The last piece in the show from 3 November, has been a great help in the inner search.
This is a sharing about working with it, to inspire others, if possible.
Questions had been going around in the head, of how to do things?
One of them being about observe and don’t absorb, when in the head it is easy to get into arguments and a reactive way of being, often the source of conflicts inside or out.
With all the information and methods provided we can be distracted and operate from the head.
Realizing the need to focus on the qualities of the heart, mentioned in the piece: simple, balance, calm, love, healing, all encompassing, inner approval, knows when to let go of things, doesn’t run or hide, cannot be retarded, speaks in melodic tones, has the music of the spheres, can be hurt, but rebounds, cannot be controlled, brings service to others.
With my hands on the chest, the heart chakra, meditating, sensing and listening.
There we are on our own, like in a retreat, creating a space for self-healing.
From there, looking and being honest with myself, facing the sometimes-painful truth, writing down the information that showed up, having a conversation with myself.
Although it is not nice to see and admit painful aspects, it opens up for healing to take place.
First admitting it, owning it, investigating it, feeling, allowing the emotions, allowing whatever shows up and go with that.
Then focusing on forgiveness, asking the Universe, the Divine, to help to allow for forgiveness to take place, both of the self and of others.
This can bring peace and is freeing.
It can be seen we are the only one responsible for dealing with any disturbances or hurts, no one can heal it, but our self.
Also what can be recognized is that no one can actually tell us what to do, or how to do things.
Others can hold a loving space, so we feel safe to explore.
We can only work with where we are at, inside, with what we are aware of, what we are capable of seeing.
From which we can find out, step by step, what we need.
It is following our inner path.
The information that starts to enter the awareness is aligned with our greatest and highest well- being, within the heart we are connected to the Divine, where we know and are whole.
Following other’s advices is following a script, not born out of insight, but a habit of following the program, others know better, we learned.
What about we know best? Or the Divine is our greatest source of information and help in healing?
Without any doubt, we don’t even need to check it with others, it is obvious and brings a feeling of gratitude for the peace and self-love it can bring, also leading to compassion for others and a wish for all to heal.
Thanks for reading, from my heart to yours.
A great piece and well written.
True spirituality is a singular pursuit.
True wealth is not in pieces of paper, it is internal.
True sovereignty is within, not claimed by title or pieces of paper.
True freedom starts within, but is best when combined with us all being free.
The meme can be reversed when they say to you; are you out of your mind? Yes, I am and that is the antidote.
Get out of your dueling and dualistic mind and become one with the heart.
The mind is your past, it is back in time, the heart space when developed is your future and beyond time.
At which point does that sink in? At which point do people come together and not divide and conquer?
At which point do people take their own personal responsibility?
And remember, it was division that got us into this mess in the first place, reversing that will correct it.